Age, as gerontologists look upon it, is a social
discourse which is constituted by a system of conventions, expectations and constraints
imposed by society on the aged subject and in the case of an aged writer it is
his/her own internalized expectations that matter too. An aged person is
supposed to be passive, miserable, decrepit, introspective and powerless,
seeking the comfort and protection of a domesticated life. This raises a few
questions: what can writers make of old age? How do they regard its
limitations, its representative archetypes, and society’s expectations of them?
How does their attitude change as they grow old?
In the last phase of his career, Yeats’s poetic genius
flourished into an unusual intensity of creative writing, so much so that it
may be considered phenomenal when it comes to the topic of creativity in old
age. Biographical attention has been given to locate its source and
formalist-aesthetic discussions have poured in to analyse the dynamics of
Yeats’s increasingly complex structuring of the experience of old age in his
works over the years of his remarkable artistic development from a fin-de-siѐcle
romantic to a metaphysical-symbolist-realist poet towards the end of his
career. Relatively less attention has been given to exploring the psycho-social
dimension of the late creativity of this gifted intellectual and hence the need
for adding a gerontological perspective to this much-discussed topic so that
old age may be seen as a powerful trope in the dynamics of Yeats’s thoughts on
death and immortality, enabling us to identify the characteristic imaginative
modes of late writing and to ramify the paradigms of gerontological studies as
well.
In this context, the images and metaphors of old age
and their rich ambivalence in Yeats’s later poems are suggestive of a
productive tension between the social conventions and stereotypes of old age
and the poet’s intensely personal experience of it as a time of apocalyptic
self-renewal. Moreover, in his later years, he seems deeply preoccupied with
the dialogue between his private and public self, leading to a self-chosen
distancing from all the external demands of the modern world on the one hand
and inventing new and less flattering ‘masks’ of antithetical selfhood on the
other. Be it the mask of a madman, or aged sexuality, or androgyny, these forms
of aged subjectivity are made to infuse new values in representing the aged and
to undermine social expectations that are too restrictive in measuring the
power and strengths of old age.
Dr. Sudipta Chakraborty is working as an Assistant Professor of English in Sreegopal Banerjee College (Govt. Sponsored and affiliated to the University of Burdwan), Hooghly, West Bengal. Dr Chakraborty has presented scholarly papers in different national and international level seminars and conferences. He has quite a few number of publications to his credit in renowned national and international journals. His doctoral dissertation ─ “Space and Cultural Geography: A Study in V.S. Naipaul’s Representation of India in his Travel Narratives” ─ has been widely acclaimed both in India and abroad. He may be contacted at schakra2006@gmail.com.
Dr. Sudipta Chakraborty is working as an Assistant Professor of English in Sreegopal Banerjee College (Govt. Sponsored and affiliated to the University of Burdwan), Hooghly, West Bengal. Dr Chakraborty has presented scholarly papers in different national and international level seminars and conferences. He has quite a few number of publications to his credit in renowned national and international journals. His doctoral dissertation ─ “Space and Cultural Geography: A Study in V.S. Naipaul’s Representation of India in his Travel Narratives” ─ has been widely acclaimed both in India and abroad. He may be contacted at schakra2006@gmail.com.